After Glasgow East...
Jul. 26th, 2008 02:19 amIt might be late, I might have spent a bizarre day drinking alcohol with three different social groups of people in three different places, but if you'll forgive me for venturing an opinion just before I retire to bed, as is the proper thing to do at this time of night, here's my thought:...
The scale of the next general election defeat for Labour/win for Cameron is going to be greater than Blair's victory in 1997.
The next general election will happen in 2010, as Gordon Brown pushes his calendar to the wire, but unfortunately for him the economic downturn will still be going on then, and badly, so he won't be able to avoid it being an issue. Our economy will be in utter crisis, with the unions (perfectly understandably) crying blue murder about wage levels, unemployment will shoot through the roof, and then the Tories will come in and rein back public spending like there's no tomorrow. Nine years (it could take 14-18) later the economy will be in better shape and people will be unutterably pissed off with the social right-wing unfairness of the Tories, and if Labour's found an inspirational leader by then there's a chance they might get back in. If not, there's still a chance we might get a charismatic leader from the LibDem side.
Meanwhile, the Scots will still be bickering about independence, but somehow will have found that consensus politics suits them regardless, and will be busy quietly building a modern 21st Century country while nobody else in the UK notices.
What do you think?
The scale of the next general election defeat for Labour/win for Cameron is going to be greater than Blair's victory in 1997.
The next general election will happen in 2010, as Gordon Brown pushes his calendar to the wire, but unfortunately for him the economic downturn will still be going on then, and badly, so he won't be able to avoid it being an issue. Our economy will be in utter crisis, with the unions (perfectly understandably) crying blue murder about wage levels, unemployment will shoot through the roof, and then the Tories will come in and rein back public spending like there's no tomorrow. Nine years (it could take 14-18) later the economy will be in better shape and people will be unutterably pissed off with the social right-wing unfairness of the Tories, and if Labour's found an inspirational leader by then there's a chance they might get back in. If not, there's still a chance we might get a charismatic leader from the LibDem side.
Meanwhile, the Scots will still be bickering about independence, but somehow will have found that consensus politics suits them regardless, and will be busy quietly building a modern 21st Century country while nobody else in the UK notices.
What do you think?
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 02:34 am (UTC)Not 'cos I'm Scottish, you understand - just because they seem to be damn well sorting their shit out. When I was your age (blah blah AWOOGA old person talking), it was a lost cause. Not any more...
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 09:09 am (UTC)And it's only now I'm giving serious thought to applying to Scottish universities and/or NHS employers in Scotland...
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 10:53 am (UTC)I suspect they'll win, but I doubt it'll be bigger than Blair's landslide, unless people get un-dissillusioned a lot quicker.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 11:36 am (UTC)I'm still not convinced it'll be a landslide, but might just be wishful thinking.
Sad to say...
Date: 2008-07-26 12:33 pm (UTC)Hmm. I have Scottish family, now might be the time to look them up. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 01:38 pm (UTC)And what if they're no better than the last lot? I have a horrible feeling that it's not *just* that all the parties are drifting towards each other, it's also that The Voting Masses don't want the proper Left. That's depressing and I hate it, but I suspect it's true.
Real socialists aren't going to get voted in, not unless they pretend to be fake ones first. (I had some vague hope that this was what Gordon Brown was doing, though alas it does not seem to be the case).
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 01:45 pm (UTC)I couldn't agree more! There's only one route to Socialism and it has nothing to do with a ballot box.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 01:52 pm (UTC)Trotskyism 101
Date: 2008-07-26 02:23 pm (UTC)'...I don't think socialism can work without democracy.'
But what do you mean by 'democracy'? Parliamentary democracy? Every four or five years a proportion of the population can 'choose' between two or three different factions representing (slightly) different ways of maintaining the status quo. And if, by rare chance, a government commited to more radical reform is elected then it is removed. Either by bloody violence, as in Chile or by a more 'liberal', British constitutional coup such as the removal of the Australian PM in 1975 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Australian_constitutional_crisis).
'...a fair and democratic public vote.'
I lived through both of the above events, so you'll forgive me if I have ZERO faith in bourgois 'democracy'...and the possibility of 'a fair and democratic public vote'.
'You can do communism without a vote, but for some reason that never works either...'
Communism is a future world system which could only be achieved after the entire world (with no exceptions) had been Socialist for several/many generations. And Socialism is a World system; it cannot exist alongside Capitalism, and Socialism is not possible in any single country or even group of nations. No nation has ever been Socialist, let alone Communist.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-27 10:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-27 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-28 04:11 pm (UTC)Moving to Scotland
Date: 2008-07-28 04:12 pm (UTC)I wonder, though, if things in Scotland would be quite so cushy if they were independent of the rest of the UK.