ajva: (Default)
[personal profile] ajva
I think the LibDems should go for it. It's not PR, but it's a slight improvement, and a hell of a concession from the Tories. And what's more, if the LibDems turn it down, they'll be seen as putting their party interest first and possibly be punished for that later on.

What do you think?

Date: 2010-05-10 07:41 pm (UTC)
barakta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] barakta
This. I would not be happy with AV only as it's not enough of a change. If we're going to go for political reform aren't we better off doing it properly rather than half arsedly which would then mean "Oh we can't change again we did it last year/decade/century".

Date: 2010-05-10 08:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajva.livejournal.com
Yes, we'd be better off doing it properly. But that isn't going to be on the table, I don't think. What is on the table is something that would make the electorate wake up to the fact that voting change is possible.

Date: 2010-05-11 05:11 pm (UTC)
barakta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] barakta
One would have to explain how an election works or can work to everyone - annoyingly we never got taught at school as that'd be politics innit...

Profile

ajva: (Default)
ajva

August 2013

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 12th, 2026 08:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios